ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MORAL CULTURE. Part I

Authors

  • Андрій Морозов State University of Trade and Economics image/svg+xml
  • Владислав Шаповалов Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2023.2(13).09

Keywords:

ethics, moral culture, Other, ontological frame, (non)metaphysical tradition, Aufheben, being as a sacred gift, transcendental "yes" and "no"

Abstract

The relevance. Forgetting the problems of being, erasing the idea of being from the worldview of modern man, and focusing on individualistic and hedonistic practices leads to the narrowing of the personality‘s fullness, dehumanization of its moral and spiritual dimension, and alienation from one's essence. Philosophical reactualization of being and its metaphysical essential foundations will allow finding a reliable ontological foundation for a shaken by skepticism and nihilism moral culture, and for the human who lost his essence. Goal. The purpose of the article is to study the ontological foundations of moral culture. The tasks of the first part of the article are to investigate the ontological framework of moral culture, and the fundamental axes on which it is based; the tasks of the second part of the article are to analyze the moral concepts of freedom, conscience, dignity, and equality through the prism of the ontological framework. Methods. The article uses a historical-philosophical and comparative method, genealogy, and hermeneutic methods of interpretation. The results. Ethical relations unfold in the value-meaning space of moral culture between the Self and the Other. The transcendental condition for the possibility of moral culture is reality and its internal structure, the parameters of which are set by the ontological framework, namely by the poles of attraction of singular and multiple, sacred and profane, phenomenal (existential) and essential. It is shown that the Western metaphysical tradition managed to find a balance between the extremes of the single and multiple, while the Eastern tradition of Hinduism, on the one hand, and the anti-metaphysical trends of the 19th and 20th centuries, on the other hand, absolutized one or the other extreme. Conclusions. Moral culture cannot be built and substantiated in isolation from ontology, and therefore without addressing being as the sphere of the real. Both metaphysical and anti-metaphysical philosophical systems are based on ontological assumptions. Without being rooted in ontology, ethics risks losing reality and realness. The transcendental "yes" or "no" to being enables further forms of moral relations and principles that exist in culture.

References

Aristotle. (1995). Metaphysics. Aristotle. Selected Works, H. G. Apostle, ed. 3rd edition. L. P. Gerson, 10 [982 b 12 ff].

Augustyn, Leszek (2012). Wolność w jedności?: Borys Wyszesіawcew I filozofia sobornosti. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagielloсskiego, 2012, seria: Jagielloсskie Studia z Filozofii.

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. Faust. Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/14591

Camus, A. (2018). The Myth of Sisyphus. Vintage International, Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

Frankl, V. (2006). Man's Search for Meaning. Foreword by Harold S. Kushner and Afterword by William J. Winslade. Beacon Press.

Fromm, E. (1976). To Have or to Be? Harper and Row.

Heidegger, M. (1977). Basic Writings. Harper and Row.

Heidegger, M. (1979). Nietzsche. Harper SanFrancisco.

Parfit, Derek. (1971). Personal identity. The philosophical review, vol. 80, 1, 3–27.

Parfit, Derek. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press.

Plato. (1966). The Apology of Socrates. Plato in Twelve Volumes, vol. 1 / Harold North Fowler, trans. Harvard University Press.

Popper, K. (2013). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton University Press.

Rawls, J. (1999). Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy [LHMP]. Harvard University Press.

Saint Maxime le Confesseur (1994). Ambigua. Avant-propos, translation and notes by E. Ponsoye, Comments by P. D. Staniloae. Les Йditions de l'Ancre.

Schopenhauer, A. (1995). On the basis of morality, E.F.J. Payne, trans. Berghahn Books, 1995.

The Concise Oxford Dictionary of World Religions. (2000). John Bowker, ed. Oxford University Press.

Tillich, P. (1951). Systematic Theology, vol. 1. University of Chicago Press.

Tillich, P. (2000). The Courage to Be. Yale University Press.

Tolkien, J.R.R. (2001). The Silmarillion. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Ward, Peter D. and Brownlee, Donald. (2000). Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe. Springer.

Watson, A. J. (2008). Implications of an Anthropic Model of Evolution for Emergence of Complex Life and Intelligence, Astrobiology 8, no. 1, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2006.0115.

Zizioulas, John. (1997). Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church (Contemporary Greek Theologians Series). St. Vladimir Seminary Press.

Published

2023-12-12

How to Cite

Морозов, Андрій, and Владислав Шаповалов. 2023. “ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF MORAL CULTURE. Part I”. Ukrainian Cultural Studies 2 (13): 48-55. https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2023.2(13).09.