Ukrainian urban vernacular garden: reconsideration in the conditions of full-scale war
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2022.2(11).02Keywords:
vernacular garden, war, public garden, guerilla gardening, everyday urban culture, Victory GardensAbstract
The paper contents a cultural analysis of the vernacular garden as a phenomenon of popular urban culture, as well as the transformation (politicization) of its role and perception in the conditions of martial law. The garden analysed at different levels: individual (gardening is an individual practice of a citizen), local (features of the local community, its values, lifestyle, common practices, problems, etc.), as well as at the level of tradition and culture. Structural analysis of the garden as a multifunctional space allows us to identify individual functions of this phenomenon. After all, by creating a home-made garden, a city dweller satisfies his needs in this way, and not only needs for products, but most often those of a social and cultural nature.
The main characteristics of the vernacular garden were revealed: structure, non-utilitarianism, procedure. The main functions of the garden are socio-political, humanitarian, food, aesthetic, educational, unifying, educational, and entertaining. Ukrainian vernacular gardening is compared with other formats of urban gardening, which have a combination of different goals and corresponding functions: "community garden", Victory gardens and guerrilla gardening. In contrast to guerrilla gardening, vernacular gardening does not initially have political intentions – to fight against the state of neglected urban areas, to draw the attention of local citizens to the problems of the district. It was determined that the individual vernacular garden acquires a new meaning in the conditions of martial law: it becomes one of grassroots initiatives, practices of resistance, stability and steadfastness. Vernacular horticulture as an individual grassroots practice is a bright and promising mediator of important social and political processes that Ukrainian society is going through in times of full-scale war.
The political aspects of urban vernacular gardening also touch on feminist issues. Usually, women are gardeners, and this fact is worth a separate study, because it is women who implement these practices and, accordingly, changes in the urban landscape, according to their botanical and aesthetic preferences, favourite plants and cultures.
References
Історія Садів Перемоги. Дата звернення: 15.08.2022. URL: https://sadyperemohy.org/#history.
Луцишин, О. З., Гілета, Л. А. (2021). Міське садівництво в умовах Львівської урбоекосистеми: можливості та переваги. Екологічні науки: науково-практичний журнал, 6(39), 141–145.
На Тернопільщині реалізовують проєкт "Шкільні сади перемоги". Рубрика. Дата звернення: 13.08.2022. URL: https://rubryka.com/2022/07/11/shkilni-sady-peremogy/.
Butsykina, Y. (2021). The Aesthetic Value of Vernacular Gardens in Ukrainian Cities. A Case Study from Rusanivka Residential District, Kyiv. Everydayness. Contemporary Aesthetic Approaches. Rome, Roma Tre-Press, 53–64.
Di Paola, M. (2017). Ethics and politics of the built environment. Cham, Springer, 165.
Emmerik, C. van. (2021). Aesthetics from the Interstices. The Making of a Home in a Palestinian Refugee Camp. Everydayness. Contemporary Aesthetic Approaches. Ed. by L. Giombini, A. Kvokačka. Rome, Roma TrePress, 207–221.
Hardman, M., Larkham, P. J., Adams, D. (2019). Gauging public views on the grassroots activity. Urban gardening as politics. Ed. by C. Tornaghi, C. Certomà. London, Routledge, 148–166.
Heidegger, M. (2001). Building Dwelling Thinking. Poetry language thought. New York, Harper and Row, 141–160.
Herrmann, M. M. (2015). The modern day "victory garden". Procedia engineering, 118, 647–653.
Holmes, K. (2001). 'I have built up a little garden': the vernacular garden, national identity and a sense of place. Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes: An International Quarterly. Vol. 21, No. 2, 115–121.
Kimber C. T. (2004). Gardens and dwelling: People in vernacular gardens. Geographical Review. Vol. 94, No. 3, 263–283.
Kurtz, H. (2001). Differentiating multiple meanings of garden and community. Urban Geography. Vol. 22, No. 7, 656–670.
Malor, D. (1996). Women's Points of View: The Domestic, the Vernacular, the Garden, and the Paddock. Australian Journal of Art. Vol. 13, No. 1, 81–92.
Roberts, J. (2006). Researching the vernacular garden, Landscape Research. Vol. 21, No. 2, 175–187.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 "UKRAINIAN CULTURAL STUDIES"

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read the policy here: https://https://ucs.knu.ua/law





















