Transformation of the archetype of the trickster in contemporary Ukrainian art: on the example of the image of Hamlet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2022.2(11).08Keywords:
trickster archetype, trickster, culture hero, hero of culture, HamletAbstract
The article analyses the transformation of the archetype of the trickster in contemporary Ukrainian art on the example of the image of Hamlet. The concepts of "trickster", "culture hero" and "hero of culture", their meaning in archaic mythology and modern culture are considered. It was found that the archetype of the trickster is reflected in art through archetypal images – the trickster, a culture hero, which can exist both syncretically and separately. The common and distinctive features of the culture hero and hero of culture have been determined. At the end of the 20th century, the functions of a culture hero and a hero of culture are mixed, which contributes to the emergence of a "mass" culture hero, whose influence is determined to a greater extent not by qualitative indicators, but by quantitative ones. It was found that, the image of modern Hamlet in various cultural texts acquires trickster features. The transformation of the image of Hamlet in contemporary Ukrainian art is studied on the example of Yu. Andruhovich's translation "Hamlet, Prince of Denmark", L. Podervyansky's remake "Hamlet or the phenomenon of Danish Katsapism" and the horror opera "Hamlet" by R. Hryhoriv and I. Razumeyko. It was determined that in all three samples, rough, and sometimes obscene language is used, which translates the original text from a tragic into a farcical-comic discourse. It was found that there is a mixing of the features of a culture hero, a trickster, and a hero of culture in this image. Furthermore, it has been studied that the archetype of the trickster is transformed through the image of the trickster and the hero of culture. It is determined that, as a trickster, Hamlet provokes the overturning and rethinking of norms and rules. As a culture hero, he creates his own mythopoetic world in his mind. As a hero of culture, he personifies generally accepted patterns of behavior that positively correspond to a certain value-cultural system of society outside the mythological time-space.
References
Бентя, Ю. В. (2021). Культурний герой сентименталізму у жанрово-стильовій картині світу. (Дис. канд. мист.). Київ, ІПСМ, 241.
Гарюнова, Ю. (2018). Вербалізація прецедентних феноменів у п'єсах Леся Подерв'янського (на матеріалі творів "Гамлєт, або Феномен датського кацапізму" й "Король Літр"). Вісник Львівського університету, Львів, 67(2), 286–293.
Деркач, М., Коржовська, О. (2014). Художня специфіка українських перекладів трагедії "Гамлет" В. Шекспіра. Полілог (2). Житомир, 40–42.
Коломієць, Л. В. (2005). Новий український "Гамлет": перекладацька стратегія Юрія Андруховича. Мова і культура: Наук. щорічн. журнал. Київ, Вид. дім Дмитра Бураго, 8, (3), 349–356.
Поліщук, Т. (2018). Пошуки і знахідки. Газета "День". 22.11.2018. Дата звернення 29.09.2022. URL: https://m.day.kyiv.ua/uk/article/kultura/poshuky-i-znahidky.
Цибулько, О. (2012). Шекспірівський текст в українському соц-арті. Вісник Львівського університету. Львів, 20(2), 207–214.
Шекспір, В. (2008). Гамлет, принц данський. Пер. Ю. Андрухович. Київ, А-БА-БА-ГА-ЛА-МА-ГА, 239.
Birenbaum, H. (1981). "To Be and Not to Be" the Archetypal Form of Hamlet. Pacific Coast Philology, Penn State University Press, 16 (1), 19–28.
Boas, F. (1898). Introduction. Teit, J. Traditions of the Thompson Indians of British Columbia. Boston, New York, 3–17.
Breysig, K. (1905). Die Entstehung des Gottesgedankes und der Heilbringer. Berlin, Georg Bondi, 216.
Brinton, D. (1868). The Myths of the New World: A Treatise on the Symbolism and Methodology of the Red Race of America. New York, 162.
Campbell, J. (2004). The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press, 403.
Eco, U. (1985). Innovation and Repetition: Between Modern and Post-Modern Aesthetics. Dedalus, The MIT Press, 114 (4), 161–184.
Genette, G. (1982). Palimpsestes: la littérature au second degré. Paris, Éditions du Seuil, 467.
Hultcrantz, А. (1973). A Definition of Shamanism. Temenos. Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion, I (9), 25–37.
Jung, C. G. (1956). On the Psychology of the Trickster Figure. Radin, P. The Trickster. A study in American Indian Mythology with Commentaries by Karl Kerenyi and C. G. Jung. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 195–211.
Jung, C. G., Kerenyi, C. (1951). Introduction to a Science of Mythology. The Myth of the Divine Child and the Mysteries of Eleusis. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 289.
Lang, A. (1901). Myth, Ritual and Religion. New York, Bombay, Longmans&Co, 236.
Petazzoni, R. (1954). Studies in the History of Religion: Essays on the History of Religions. Leiden, Brill, I, 225.
Radin, P. (1956). The Trickster. A study in American Indian Mythology with Commentaries by Karl Kerenyi and C. G. Jung. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 211.
Ricketts, M. (1966). The North American Indians Trickster. History of Religions. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 5(2), 327–350.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 "UKRAINIAN CULTURAL STUDIES"

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read the policy here: https://https://ucs.knu.ua/law





















