Methodological basis of cultural institutions studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2020.1(6).02Keywords:
Cultural Institutes Studies, social institution, joint activity, social practices, Cultural Economics, cultural economy, and cultural policyAbstract
The article deals with the "atomistic", "holistic", "teleological" theories of social institutions, which form the methodological basis for the Cultural Institutions Studies. The "atomistic" theories of institutions (D. North, D. Hodgson, E. Ostrom) relate to the conclusions of the institutional economics put emphasize on the importance of certain normative models and frameworks of social behavior, which are the institutions. Representatives of the "holistic" theories of institutions (G. Spencer, E. Durkheim, T. Parsons) highlight the connection between institutions ("structures") and their contribution to a society ("function"), and distinct institution are described as interdependent and necessary for functioning of the society in general. Representatives of the "teleological" approach in explaining the essence of social institutions (P. Gielen, S. Miller, Ch. Taylor, etc.) focus on the realization of a common goal, which is a set of interrelated individual goals, which are perceived by distinct individuals as their personal goal, but which makes sense only in the interaction of all participants of joint actions. Such actions most find their expression in the cultural sphere: team games, dances, theatrical performances, musical events, academic activities, etc.
Recourse to these concepts allows us to outline the problematic field of cultural institutions studies as a research area, which is based on the latest investigation in cultural studies, sociology, and cultural economics. The main tasks of cultural institutions studies are related to the creation of descriptions of institutional practices, the elucidation of the patterns of functioning of cultural institutions, the prediction of future changes in institutional cultural practices in the context of cultural economy and cultural policy.
In consideration of the basic approaches to the definition of a social institute, the essential characteristics of a cultural institute are revealed, which are manifested in three aspects: normative and regulatory aspect (complex of values, norms, rules), behavioral and procedural aspect (behavioral models, institutional roles, forms of joint interaction), organizational aspect (cultural institutions that produce, preserve and promote cultural good).
References
Гілен П. Інституційна уява: інституціоналізація сучасного мис- тецтва (мінус "сучасного") / П. Гілен // Переформатування спільного міста. На перетині мистецтва, політики й громадського життя: зб. статей [пер. с англ. Я. Стріха]. – Харків: IST Publishing, 2019. – С. 57‒82.
Культура и рынок. Опекаемые блага [под ред. А. Я. Рубинштейна, В. Ю. Музычук]. – СПб.: Алетейя, 2013. – 400 с.
Маслікова І. І. До визначення поняття культурного інституту / І. І. Маслікова // Науковий часопис НПУ ім. М. П. Драгоманова. – 2007. – Серія 7, No12 (25). – С. 63‒70.
Маслікова І. І. У пошуках спільного блага: етичні колізії соці- альних практик: монографія / І. І. Маслікова. – К.: Вид. "Міленіум", 2018. – 338 с.
Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функ- ционирование экономики [пер. с англ. А. Н. Нестеренко] / Д. Норт. – М.: Фонд экономической книги "Начала", 1997. – 180 c.
Нуссбаум М. Не ради прибыли. Зачем демократии нужны гу- манитарные науки [пер. с англ. М. Бендет; под науч. ред. А. Смирнова] / М. Нуссбаум. – М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2014. – 192 с.
Остром Э. Управляя общим: эволюция институтов коллектив- ной деятельности [пер. с англ. А. Нестеренко] / Э. Остром. – М.: ИРИСЭН, Мысль, 2010. – 447 с.
Талеб Н. Н. Черный лебедь. Под знаком непредсказуемости [пер. с англ. В. Сонькина, А. Бердичевского, М. Костионова, О. Попова; 2-е изд., дополненное] / Н. Н. Талеб. – М.: КоЛибри, Азбука-Аттикус, 2017. – 736 с.
Тросби Д. Экономика и культура [пер. с англ. И. Кушнаревой] / Д. Тросби. – М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2013. – 256 с.
Хезмондалш Д. Культурные индустрии [пер. с англ. И. Кушнаревой] / Д. Хезмондалш. – М.: Издательство Высшей школы экономики, 2014. – 456 с.
Ходжсон Д. Экономическая теория и институты [пер. с англ. М. Я. Каждана] / Д. Ходжсон. – М.: Издательство "Дело", 2003. – 464 с.
Handbook of Cultural Economics. Edited by Ruth Towse, second edition. – Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2011. – 439 р.
Hasitschka W., Tschmuck P., Zembylas T. Cultural Institutions Studies: Investigating the Transformation of Cultural Goods / W. Hasitschka, P. Tschmuck, T. Zembylas // The Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society. – Vol. 35. – Nr. 2. – 2005. – P. 147‒158.
Miller S. Social Institutions / S. Miller // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), [Edward N. Zalta (ed.)]. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/social-institutions/.
Miller S. The moral foundations of social institutions: a philosophical study / S. Miller. – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. – 371 p.
Searle J. The Construction of Social Reality / J. Searle. – New York: Free Press, 1995. – 241 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 "UKRAINIAN CULTURAL STUDIES"

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read the policy here: https://https://ucs.knu.ua/law





















