Polemicness and agonality of discourse of love: philosophical and cultural view
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2019.1(4).07Keywords:
love, love discourse, war, battle, admiration, courtly love, gift, polemicness, agonality, ErosAbstract
The article conceptualizes the idea of the unity of love and war based on the mythological, cultural, and philosophical aspects. The author, based on a number of theoretical and empirical arguments, hypothesizes that the "polemical" (warlike) Eros`s image as archer with arrows has its roots in Middle Eastern (Sumerian-Akkadian, Semitic) mythology, which saw not the opposition of love and war, and a close relationship of these phenomenons in the image of Ishtar (Inanna, Astarte). It is highlighted that the courtly culture of love through the idea of winning lady's heart is characterized by the fact that it is the cultural, empirical embodiment of the understanding of the unity of the discourse of love and the discourse of war. It emphazises the idea that the philosophical aspect of understanding this issue is associated with two phenomenons, namely power and gift. Accordingly, it is within the frame- work of the discourse of love that the “admiration” takes place, the effect of which is explained by the fact that having subjugated the object of love, the subject himself obeys him. At the same time, in the context of the gift, there is an “agon”, that is, a competition between those in love regarding the exchange of gifts and pleasures. Therefore, it is argued that the discourse of love is polemical and agonal.
References
Афанасьева В. К., Дьяконов И. М. Иштар // Мифы народов мира. Энциклопедия в двух томах / С. А. Токарев. – М.: Советская Энцикло- педия, 1991. – Т. 1 (А‒К). – С. 595.
Барт Р. Фрагменти мови закоханого / Р. Барт. – Львів: Незалеж- ний культурологічний журнал "Ї", 2006. – 283 с.
Брагинская Н.В. Откуда у Эрота крылья? / Н.В.Брагинская // Nymphon antron. Сборник статей в честь Азы Алибековны Тахо-Годи / Ответственный редактор А. И. Солопов. // Вопросы классической фило- логии. Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоно- сова, Филологический факультет. ‒ Никея Москва, 2011. ‒ С. 53–94.
Дюби Ж. Куртуазная любовь и перемены в положении женщин во Франции XII в. / Ж. Дюби // Одиссей. Человек в истории. – М.: Наука, 1990. – С. 90‒96.
Иванова-Казас О. М. Мифологическая зоология / О. М. Иванова- Казас. – СПб: Филологический ф-т СПбГУ, 2004. – 264 с.
Малахов В. А. Погляд на любов / В. Малахов // Етика спілкування: Навч. посібник. – К.: Либідь, 2006. – С. 362–369.
Ружмон Д. де. Искусство любить и искусство воевать / Д. де Ружмон / Коллеж социологии. – СПб.: Наука, 2004. – С. 267‒290.
Яровой А. В. От культуры войны к войне культур: социокультурные проекции агональности в европейской и евразийской культурах / А. В. Яровой. – М., Берлин: Директ-Медиа, 2017. – 310 с.
Black J., Green A. Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia: An Illustrated Dictionary / J. Black, A. Green ‒ Austin and London, University of Texas Press, 1992. ‒ 192 p.
Chroust A.-H. The Influence of Zoroastrian Teachings on Plato, Aristotle, and Greek Philosophy in General / A.-H. Chroust // New scholasticism. – Wash., 1980. – Vol. 54 – No 3. – рр. 342‒357.
Digby T. Love and War: How Militarism Shapes Sexuality and Romance / T. Digby. ‒ Columbia University Press, 2014. ‒ 240 p.
Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae. ‒ Zürich und München: Artemis Verlag, 1986. ‒ III.1, Atherion ‒ Eros. XXX + 1086 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 "UKRAINIAN CULTURAL STUDIES"

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Read the policy here: https://https://ucs.knu.ua/law





















