Culture-creative potential of sacral experience: theoretical and methodological analysis

Authors

  • V. Y. Golovei Lesia Ukrainka Eastern European National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2017.1.05

Keywords:

Sacral experience, culture, sacred, profane, religious, secular

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze the cultural potential of sacred experience and highlight the main methodological approaches to its study. The sacred experience is explicated as an experience of correlation with the absolute dimension of being, its experience and comprehension. The concept of "Sacred experience" defines a culturally organized space that acquires a specific form for each culture and is structured as a meaningful hierarchical world full of spiritual and symbolic meanings. The experience of the sacred is based on direct experience of eternity and the totality of existence as a living reality. This experience is "the experience of being" the primary expression of existential guidance, global anthropological orientation. It integrates the dominant spiritual orientation in the human world and understanding of the system itself. Sacred experience based implicitly in present most important human endeavour, promotes the formation of the humanity. This experience permeates the entire story as vertical as the Earth's axis, culminating in the transcendent dimension - where a person entrusts himself to Absolute (God, being, good, eternal, etc.). We can say that any strategy or implemented anthropological model has its core generating a sacred experience. The author asserts that the experience of Holy is distinguished by ontological content and nature. It is an experience of symbolic acts of transcendence that create ontological horizon of being. At the same time, this is an experience of cultural creation and self-creation, which forms the sense foundations of human existence, reveals and confirms the human nature. Loss of sacred power and constitutive force of the sacred dimension interpreted as a manifestation of a kind of "weakening being", de-ontologization of culture, that accompanied the release of simulative and destructive potential and leads to a decrease in the intensity and quality of cultural development. 

References

Батай Ж. Внутренний опыт / Ж. Батай ; [пер. с фр. С. Л. Фокин]. – СПб. : Аксиома, Мифрил, 1997. – 336 с.

Батай Ж. Эротика / Ж. Батай ; [пер. с фр. Е. Д. Гальцева] // "Проклятая часть": Сакральная социология / Ж. Батай. – М. : Ладомир, 2006. – С. 491–701.

Ґадамер Г.-Ґ. Істина і метод. У 2-х т. – Т. 1: Герменевтика І / Г.-Ґ. Ґадамер; [пер. з нім. О. Мокровольський] – К. : Юніверс, 2000. – 464 с.

Гегель Г.-В.-Ф. Феноменология духа / Г.-В.-Ф. Гегель. – СПб.: Наука,1999. – 443 с.

Гуссерль Э. Картезианские размышления / Э. Гуссерль ; [пер. с нем. Д. В. Скляднев]. – СПб. : Наука, 1998. – 316 с.

Джемс У. Многообразие религиозного опыта / У. Джемс ; [пер. с англ. У. С. Элбакян] // Мистика. Религия. Наука : Антология. – М. : Канон+, 1998. – С. 149–173.

Кассирер Э. Логика наук о культуре / Э. Кассирер ; [пер. с нем. и коммент. С. О. Кузнєцов и Б. Вимер] // Избранное. Опыт о человеке / Э. Кассирер. – М. : Гардарика, 1998. – С. 7–154.

Мамардашвили М. К. Эстетика мышления / М. К. Мамардашвили. – М. : Московская школа политических исследо-ваний, 2000. – 416 с.

Мінаков М. Історія поняття досвіду / М. Мінаков. – К. : Парапан, 2007. – 380 с.

Тиллих П. Динамика веры / П. Тиллих ; [пер. с англ. Т. И. Ве-вюрко] // Избранное: Теология культуры / П. Тиллих. – М.: Юрист, 1995. – С. 132–215.

Франк С. Л. Духовные основы общества / С. Л. Франк. – М. : Республика, 1992. – 511 с.

Фуко М. О трансгрессии / М. Фуко. // Танатография эроса. – Спб. : Мифрил, 1994. – С. 111–131.

Хайдеггер М. Что такое метафизика / М. Хайдеггер ; [пер. с нем., вступ. ст. и коммент. В. В. Бибихин] // Время и бытие: Статьи и выступления. – М.: Республика, 1993. – С. 16–27.

Хоружий С. С. К феноменологии аскезы / С. С. Хоружий – М. :Изд-во гуманитарной литературы, 1998. – 352 с.

Published

2017-10-17

Issue

Section

THEORETICAL CULTURAL STUDIES

How to Cite

V. Y. Golovei. 2017. “Culture-Creative Potential of Sacral Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Analysis”. Ukrainian Cultural Studies 1 (1): 22-26. https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2017.1.05.