Social media platforms as discursive environments in the context of Russo-Ukrainian war

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2025.1(16).04

Keywords:

social media, discourse, mediatization, information warfare, civil society, temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, digital public sphere

Abstract

Background. Social media platforms have become primary channels of media consumption and key battlegrounds for information warfare. Their socio-technical affordances democratize cultural production–fueling new forms of expression, political mobilization, and even participation in military operations-while also enabling large-scale propaganda, cultural influence, and historical documentation on both sides of the Russo-Ukrainian frontline. Operating beyond state control, these platforms serve not only tactical communication needs but also broader processes of identity-building, cultural resistance, and the preservation of collective memory. Intensified by the protracted conflict and ongoing mediatization trends, this unique digital landscape demands urgent socio-humanitarian analysis.

Methods. This study employs a multi-method design to explore cultural production and discursive practices during the Russo-Ukrainian War. We mapped social media affordances via media-studies frameworks; harvested public posts, metadata, hashtags, and profiles using OSINT; and conducted informal content analysis. Narrative and critical discourse analyses revealed story arcs and ideological strategies, while memory and spatial analyses examined commemorative posts and symbolic redefinitions of urban spaces.

Results. The Russo-Ukrainian war is highly mediatized, with smartphones and social media turning civilians into active participants. These platforms enable content creation, OSINT, propaganda, and resistance, reshaping cultural practices and information flows. In occupied areas, competing media narratives emerge-occupation channels seek to legitimize control, while grassroots resistance documents realities and reinforces Ukrainian identity. Social media becomes both a battlefield and an archive of war.

Conclusions. Social media platforms shape the digital image of the city through the production of everyday content. Media content is used for cultural influence and to establish control over the newly formed digital public sphere. The publication of digital content is, in essence, a process of cultural production in social media. Therefore, social media constitute a valuable source for research, as they allow us to study the transformations that occur during the occupation, as well as to predict the development of reintegration policies.

References

Asmolov, G. (2022). The transformation of participatory warfare: The role of narratives in connective mobilization in the Russia–Ukraine war. Digital War. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-022-00054-5

Asmolov, G. (2024). Propaganda in the Network Environment: How propaganda has changed in the era of social media and during times of war. Re: Russia. https://re-russia.net/en/expertise/714/

Bareikytė, M., & Makhortykh, M. (2024). Digitally witnessable war from pereklychka to propaganda: Unfolding Telegram communication during Russia's war in Ukraine. Media, War & Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352241255890

Beetz, J. (2016). Materiality and subject in Marxism, (post-)structuralism, and material semiotics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59837-0

Boichak, O. (2017). Battlefront volunteers. In #SMSociety17: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on social media & society (pp. 1–10). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097289

Drozdova, Y., Dukach, Y., Kel, N. (2022). Telegram Occupation. How Russia Wanted to Breed a Media Monster, but Ended up with a Paper Tiger. Texty. https://texty.org.ua/projects/108161/telegram-occupation-how-russia-/wanted-breed-media-monster-ended-paper-tiger/ [in Ukrainian] [Дроздова, Є., Кельм, Н., & Дукач, Ю. (2022, 29 жовтня). Телеграм-окупація. Як Росія вибудовувала медіамережу, а вийшло потьомкінське село. Texty.org.ua – статті та журналістика даних для людей – Тексти.org.ua. https://texty.org.ua/projects/108016/telehram-okupaciya-yak-rosiya-vybudovuvala/-mediamerezhu-vyjshlo-potomkinske-selo/]

Dyer-Witheford, N., & Matviyenko, S. (2019). Cyberwar and revolution: Digital subterfuge in global capitalism. Univ Of Minnesota Press.

Ford, M. (2024). From innovation to participation: Connectivity and the conduct of contemporary warfare. International Affairs, 100(4), 1531–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiae061

Hetmanova, D. (2024). The politics of (un)gratefulness. on russian "reconstruction" projects in occupied mariupol. Mariupol Memory Park. https://www.mariupolmemorypark.space/en/library-en/the-politics-of-/ungratefulness

Horbyk, R. (2022). "The war phone": Mobile communication on the frontline in Eastern Ukraine. Digital War. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-022-00049-2

Nazaruk, T. (2022). Subscribe and Follow. Telegram and Responsive Archiving the War in Ukraine. Sociologica, 16(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1971-8853/15339

Pavlova, O., & Rohozha, M. (2023). Mariupol siege viber-community as a form of grassroot movement in the context of "declining state of global democracy". Ideology and Politics Journal, 241–275.

Pavlova, O., & Rohozha, M. (2025). Communicative practices of perception and memory of Russian-Ukrainian war and the graphosphere of the media channel. Studies in East European Thought. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-025-09712-2

Pavlova, O. (2022). When visual practices became mediatized: The context of the signification mode of Modernism and the Classic culture industry. Ukrainian Cultural Studies, (2 (11), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.17721/ucs.2022.2(11).13 [in Ukrainian]. [Павлова, О. (2022). Коли візуальні практики стали медіатизованими: контекст способу сигніфікації модернізму та класичної культурної індустрії. Українські культурологічні студії, (2 (11)), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2022.2(11).13]

Soklakov, M. (2024). Cultural Production on Social Media: Case Study of Occupied Town. Ukrainian Cultural Studies 2 (15): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2024.2(15).10. [in Ukrainian] [Соклаков, М. (2024). Культурне виробництво в соціальних медіа: ситуаційний аналіз окупованого міста. Вісник: Українські культурологічні студії, 2(15), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2024.2(15).10]

Tormakhova, A. (2022). Digital image of the city as a form of communication. Ukrainian Cultural Studies, 2(11), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2022.2(11).14

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

How to Cite

Soklakov, Maksym. 2025. “Social Media Platforms As Discursive Environments in the Context of Russo-Ukrainian War”. Ukrainian Cultural Studies 1 (16): 30-36. https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2025.1(16).04.